photography: was originated

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents hobby
Weight: 0.67
, art
Weight: 0.65
, medium
Weight: 0.64
, invention
Weight: 0.64
, passion
Weight: 0.62
Siblings painting
Weight: 0.35
, watercolor
Weight: 0.35
, calligraphy
Weight: 0.34
, needlework
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
was originated 1.00
was invented 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(art, was invented)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(photography, was originated)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(photography, was originated)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(art, was invented)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(photography, was originated)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(art, was invented)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(photography, was originated)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(calligraphy, was invented)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(art, was invented)
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(photography, was originated)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(photography, was originated)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(photography, was originated)
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(calligraphy, was invented)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(calligraphy, was invented)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(photography, was originated)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(photography, was originated)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(photography, was originated)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(photography, was originated)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(photography, was originated)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(photography, was originated)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(photography, was originated)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(photography, was originated)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(art, was invented)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(photography, was originated)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(calligraphy, was invented)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(photography, was originated)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(art, was invented)