physics: is difficult

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents science
Weight: 0.67
, department
Weight: 0.64
, class
Weight: 0.59
, field
Weight: 0.58
, teacher
Weight: 0.56
Siblings quantum physics
Weight: 0.70
, computer science
Weight: 0.38
, mathematics
Weight: 0.37
, biology
Weight: 0.36
, metaphysics
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
is difficult 1.00
is hard 0.82
is complicated 0.81
be important to communtity 0.76
is level hard 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(science, is hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(physics, is difficult)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(class, is hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(physics, is difficult)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(physics, is difficult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(class, is hard)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(physics, is difficult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(science, is hard)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(physics, is difficult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(class, is hard)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(physics, is difficult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(science, is hard)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(physics, is difficult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(quantum physics, is hard)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(physics, is difficult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(computer science, is difficult)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(physics, is difficult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(computer science, is hard)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(physics, is difficult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(mathematics, is hard)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(science, is hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(physics, is difficult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(physics, is difficult)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(class, is hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(physics, is difficult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(physics, is difficult)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(physics, is difficult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(computer science, is difficult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(computer science, is difficult)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(physics, is difficult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(mathematics, is hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(mathematics, is hard)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(physics, is difficult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(computer science, is hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(computer science, is hard)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(physics, is difficult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(quantum physics, is hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(quantum physics, is hard)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(physics, is difficult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(physics, is difficult)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(physics, is difficult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(physics, is hard)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(physics, is difficult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(physics, is complicated)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(physics, is difficult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(physics, is hard)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(physics, is difficult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(physics, is complicated)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(physics, is difficult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(physics, is hard)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(physics, is difficult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(physics, is complicated)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(physics, is difficult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(physics, is hard)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(physics, is difficult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(physics, is complicated)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(physics, is difficult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(physics, is difficult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(physics, is difficult)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(physics, is difficult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(physics, is difficult)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(physics, is difficult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(class, is hard)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(physics, is difficult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(science, is hard)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(physics, is difficult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(quantum physics, is hard)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(physics, is difficult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(computer science, is difficult)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(physics, is difficult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(mathematics, is hard)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(physics, is difficult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(computer science, is hard)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(physics, is difficult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(class, is hard)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(physics, is difficult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(science, is hard)