picnic table: has physical part holes

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents table
Weight: 0.81
, seating
Weight: 0.69
, item
Weight: 0.65
, feature
Weight: 0.62
Siblings picnic
Weight: 0.58
, horseshoe
Weight: 0.52
, dining table
Weight: 0.41
, coffee table
Weight: 0.40
, hash table
Weight: 0.39

Related properties

Property Similarity
has physical part holes 1.00
be left in hole 0.81
has physical part legs 0.78
has physical part zones 0.78
be left in hole in tree 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(table, has physical part legs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(picnic table, has physical part holes)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(seating, has physical part zones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(picnic table, has physical part holes)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(item, be left in hole in tree) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(picnic table, has physical part holes)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(picnic table, has physical part holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(item, be left in hole in tree)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(picnic table, has physical part holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(seating, has physical part zones)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(picnic table, has physical part holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(table, has physical part legs)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(picnic table, has physical part holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(item, be left in hole in tree)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(picnic table, has physical part holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(seating, has physical part zones)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(picnic table, has physical part holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(table, has physical part legs)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(table, has physical part legs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(picnic table, has physical part holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(picnic table, has physical part holes)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(seating, has physical part zones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(picnic table, has physical part holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(picnic table, has physical part holes)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(item, be left in hole in tree) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(picnic table, has physical part holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(picnic table, has physical part holes)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(picnic table, has physical part holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(picnic table, has physical part holes)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(picnic table, has physical part holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(picnic table, has physical part holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(picnic table, has physical part holes)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(picnic table, has physical part holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(picnic table, has physical part holes)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(picnic table, has physical part holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(seating, has physical part zones)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(picnic table, has physical part holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(table, has physical part legs)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(picnic table, has physical part holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(item, be left in hole in tree)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(picnic table, has physical part holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(seating, has physical part zones)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(picnic table, has physical part holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(table, has physical part legs)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(picnic table, has physical part holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(item, be left in hole in tree)