picture: be at art show

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents piece
Weight: 0.65
, keepsake
Weight: 0.65
, illustration
Weight: 0.63
, concept
Weight: 0.60
Siblings picture frame
Weight: 0.76
, joke
Weight: 0.62
, portrait
Weight: 0.61
, view
Weight: 0.61
, wallpaper
Weight: 0.61

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at art show 1.00
be at art store 0.87
be find in art gallery 0.87
be paint by artist 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(picture, be at art show)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(picture frame, be at art show)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(picture, be at art show)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(picture frame, be at art store)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(picture, be at art show)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(portrait, be paint by artist)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(picture, be at art show)
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(picture frame, be at art store)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(picture frame, be at art store)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(picture, be at art show)
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(picture frame, be at art show)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(picture frame, be at art show)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(picture, be at art show)
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(portrait, be paint by artist)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(portrait, be paint by artist)

Salient implies Plausible

0.14
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(picture, be at art show)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(picture, be at art show)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(picture, be at art show)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(picture, be find in art gallery)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(picture, be at art show)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(picture, be find in art gallery)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(picture, be at art show)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(picture, be find in art gallery)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(picture, be at art show)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(picture, be find in art gallery)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(picture, be at art show)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(picture, be at art show)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(picture, be at art show)

Typical implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(picture, be at art show)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(picture, be at art show)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(picture, be at art show)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(portrait, be paint by artist)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(picture, be at art show)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(picture frame, be at art show)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(picture, be at art show)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(picture frame, be at art store)