picture: come on tv

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents piece
Weight: 0.65
, keepsake
Weight: 0.65
, illustration
Weight: 0.63
, figure
Weight: 0.63
Siblings picture frame
Weight: 0.76
, screen saver
Weight: 0.68
, avatar
Weight: 0.65
, joke
Weight: 0.62
, answer
Weight: 0.62

Related properties

Property Similarity
come on tv 1.00
be blurred on tv shows 0.81
be in spanish on netflix 0.80
is com crap 0.77
come out blurry on facebook 0.77
be live on iphone 0.76
get on internet 0.76
go on whatsapp 0.76
show up on facebook 0.75
dot com suck 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(picture, come on tv)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(avatar, be in spanish on netflix)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(picture, come on tv)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(answer, is com crap)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(picture, come on tv)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(answer, dot com suck)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(picture, come on tv)
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(avatar, be in spanish on netflix)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(avatar, be in spanish on netflix)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(picture, come on tv)
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(answer, is com crap)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(answer, is com crap)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(picture, come on tv)
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(answer, dot com suck)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(answer, dot com suck)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(picture, come on tv)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(picture, come on tv)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Salient(picture, come on tv)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(picture, come on tv)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(picture, come on tv)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(picture, come on tv)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(picture, come on tv)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(picture, come on tv)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(avatar, be in spanish on netflix)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(picture, come on tv)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(answer, is com crap)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(picture, come on tv)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(answer, dot com suck)