piece: be at paper in office supply cabinet

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents example
Weight: 0.62
, man
Weight: 0.61
, film
Weight: 0.61
, thing
Weight: 0.61
Siblings necklace
Weight: 0.66
, picture frame
Weight: 0.66
, collection
Weight: 0.65
, picture
Weight: 0.65
, photo
Weight: 0.64

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at paper in office supply cabinet 1.00
be at cabinet 0.85
be at office 0.80
be at office build 0.77
be at paper in bathroom 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(thing, be at cabinet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(piece, be at paper in office supply cabinet)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(film, be at cabinet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(piece, be at paper in office supply cabinet)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(piece, be at paper in office supply cabinet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(film, be at cabinet)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(piece, be at paper in office supply cabinet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(thing, be at cabinet)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(piece, be at paper in office supply cabinet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(film, be at cabinet)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(piece, be at paper in office supply cabinet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(thing, be at cabinet)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(piece, be at paper in office supply cabinet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(photo, be at cabinet)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(thing, be at cabinet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(piece, be at paper in office supply cabinet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(piece, be at paper in office supply cabinet)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(film, be at cabinet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(piece, be at paper in office supply cabinet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(piece, be at paper in office supply cabinet)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(piece, be at paper in office supply cabinet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(photo, be at cabinet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(photo, be at cabinet)

Salient implies Plausible

0.15
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(piece, be at paper in office supply cabinet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(piece, be at paper in office supply cabinet)

Similarity expansion

0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(piece, be at paper in office supply cabinet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(piece, be at paper in bathroom)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(piece, be at paper in office supply cabinet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(piece, be at paper in bathroom)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(piece, be at paper in office supply cabinet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(piece, be at paper in bathroom)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(piece, be at paper in office supply cabinet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(piece, be at paper in bathroom)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(piece, be at paper in office supply cabinet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(piece, be at paper in office supply cabinet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(piece, be at paper in office supply cabinet)

Typical implies Plausible

0.11
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(piece, be at paper in office supply cabinet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(piece, be at paper in office supply cabinet)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(piece, be at paper in office supply cabinet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(thing, be at cabinet)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(piece, be at paper in office supply cabinet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(film, be at cabinet)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(piece, be at paper in office supply cabinet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(photo, be at cabinet)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(piece, be at paper in office supply cabinet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(thing, be at cabinet)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(piece, be at paper in office supply cabinet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(film, be at cabinet)