pier: be at bridge

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents attraction
Weight: 0.63
, place
Weight: 0.62
, element
Weight: 0.57
, area
Weight: 0.56
, ship
Weight: 0.54
Siblings beach
Weight: 0.35
, boardwalk
Weight: 0.35
, dock
Weight: 0.35
, amusement park
Weight: 0.34
, park
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at bridge 1.00
has bridge 0.98
be con from bridge 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.58
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(ship, has bridge) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(pier, be at bridge)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(ship, be con from bridge) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(pier, be at bridge)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(pier, be at bridge) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(ship, has bridge)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(pier, be at bridge) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(ship, be con from bridge)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.50
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(pier, be at bridge) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(ship, has bridge)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(pier, be at bridge) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(ship, be con from bridge)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(ship, has bridge) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(pier, be at bridge) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(pier, be at bridge)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(ship, be con from bridge) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(pier, be at bridge) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(pier, be at bridge)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(pier, be at bridge) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(pier, be at bridge)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(pier, be at bridge) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(pier, be at bridge) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(pier, be at bridge)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(pier, be at bridge) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(pier, be at bridge)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(pier, be at bridge) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(ship, has bridge)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(pier, be at bridge) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(ship, be con from bridge)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(pier, be at bridge) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(ship, has bridge)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(pier, be at bridge) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(ship, be con from bridge)