:
from
Related concepts
Related properties
Priors about this statement
Cues
|
Evidence
|
Clauses
Plausibility inference from child typicality
0.66
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(animal, have fur)
⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(pig, have fur)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(mammal, have fur)
⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(pig, have fur)
Plausibility inheritance from parent to child
0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(pig, have fur)
⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(mammal, have fur)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(pig, have fur)
⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(animal, have fur)
Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child
0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(pig, have fur)
⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(mammal, have fur)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(pig, have fur)
⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(animal, have fur)
Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(pig, have fur)
⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(rabbit, have fur)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(pig, have fur)
⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(guinea pig, have fur)
Remarkability from parent implausibility
Remarkability from sibling implausibility
Salient implies Plausible
0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(pig, have fur)
⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(pig, have fur)
Typical and Remarkable implies Salient
0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(pig, have fur)
⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(pig, have fur)
⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(pig, have fur)
Typical implies Plausible
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(pig, have fur)
⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(pig, have fur)
Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child
0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(pig, have fur)
⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(mammal, have fur)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(pig, have fur)
⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(animal, have fur)
Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings
0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(pig, have fur)
⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(guinea pig, have fur)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(pig, have fur)
⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(rabbit, have fur)
Typicality inheritance from parent to child
0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(pig, have fur)
⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(mammal, have fur)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(pig, have fur)
⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(animal, have fur)