pigeon: be in cities

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents bird
Weight: 0.72
, animal
Weight: 0.58
, guinea pig
Weight: 0.56
, creature
Weight: 0.55
, wild animal
Weight: 0.53
Siblings dodo
Weight: 0.43
, peregrine falcon
Weight: 0.39
, falcon
Weight: 0.38
, seagull
Weight: 0.37
, blue bird
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in cities 1.00
live in cities 0.96
be found in cities 0.93
live in big cities 0.92
thrive in cities 0.84
be in city 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(pigeon, be in cities)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(seagull, be in cities)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(pigeon, be in cities)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(peregrine falcon, live in cities)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(pigeon, be in cities)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(falcon, live in cities)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(pigeon, be in cities)
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(peregrine falcon, live in cities)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(peregrine falcon, live in cities)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(pigeon, be in cities)
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(falcon, live in cities)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(falcon, live in cities)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(pigeon, be in cities)
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(seagull, be in cities)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(seagull, be in cities)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(pigeon, be in cities)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(pigeon, be in cities)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(pigeon, be in cities)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(pigeon, live in cities)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(pigeon, be in cities)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(pigeon, be found in cities)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(pigeon, be in cities)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(pigeon, be found in cities)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(pigeon, be in cities)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(pigeon, live in cities)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(pigeon, be in cities)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(pigeon, thrive in cities)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(pigeon, be in cities)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(pigeon, be found in cities)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(pigeon, be in cities)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(pigeon, be found in cities)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(pigeon, be in cities)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(pigeon, live in cities)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(pigeon, be in cities)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(pigeon, thrive in cities)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(pigeon, be in cities)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(pigeon, live in cities)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(pigeon, be in cities)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(pigeon, thrive in cities)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(pigeon, be in cities)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(pigeon, thrive in cities)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(pigeon, be in cities)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(pigeon, be in city)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(pigeon, be in cities)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(pigeon, be in city)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(pigeon, be in cities)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(pigeon, be in city)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(pigeon, be in cities)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(pigeon, be in city)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(pigeon, be in cities)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(pigeon, be in cities)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(pigeon, be in cities)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(pigeon, be in cities)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(pigeon, be in cities)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(pigeon, be in cities)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(seagull, be in cities)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(pigeon, be in cities)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(peregrine falcon, live in cities)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(pigeon, be in cities)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(falcon, live in cities)