pigeon: have covered in scales feet

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents bird
Weight: 0.72
, animal
Weight: 0.58
, guinea pig
Weight: 0.56
, creature
Weight: 0.55
, wild animal
Weight: 0.53
Siblings dodo
Weight: 0.43
, peregrine falcon
Weight: 0.39
, falcon
Weight: 0.38
, seagull
Weight: 0.37
, blue bird
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
have covered in scales feet 1.00
have f*cked up feet 0.84
get feet 0.83
have red feet 0.82
has physical part feet 0.81
have gammy feet 0.80
have weird feet 0.80
lose feet 0.80
have damaged feet 0.77
get deformed feet 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(pigeon, have covered in scales feet)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(pigeon, have covered in scales feet)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(pigeon, have covered in scales feet)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(pigeon, has physical part feet)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(pigeon, have covered in scales feet)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(pigeon, has physical part feet)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(pigeon, have covered in scales feet)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(pigeon, has physical part feet)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(pigeon, have covered in scales feet)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(pigeon, have red feet)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(pigeon, have covered in scales feet)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(pigeon, has physical part feet)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(pigeon, have covered in scales feet)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(pigeon, have red feet)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(pigeon, have covered in scales feet)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(pigeon, have red feet)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(pigeon, have covered in scales feet)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(pigeon, have red feet)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(pigeon, have covered in scales feet)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(pigeon, have covered in scales feet)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(pigeon, have covered in scales feet)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(pigeon, have covered in scales feet)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(pigeon, have covered in scales feet)