pine tree: have thin leaves

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents evergreen
Weight: 0.62
, conifer
Weight: 0.61
, time
Weight: 0.38
, example
Weight: 0.36
, type
Weight: 0.26
Siblings pine
Weight: 0.38
, christmas tree
Weight: 0.37
, cedar
Weight: 0.37
, douglas fir
Weight: 0.36
, juniper
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
have thin leaves 1.00
have leaves 0.85
need thin needles 0.82
have needle like leaves 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.36
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(conifer, have needle like leaves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(pine tree, have thin leaves)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(conifer, have leaves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(pine tree, have thin leaves)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(pine tree, have thin leaves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(conifer, have leaves)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(pine tree, have thin leaves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(conifer, have needle like leaves)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(pine tree, have thin leaves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(conifer, have leaves)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(pine tree, have thin leaves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(conifer, have needle like leaves)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(pine tree, have thin leaves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(pine, have leaves)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(conifer, have needle like leaves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(pine tree, have thin leaves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(pine tree, have thin leaves)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(conifer, have leaves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(pine tree, have thin leaves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(pine tree, have thin leaves)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(pine tree, have thin leaves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(pine, have leaves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(pine, have leaves)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(pine tree, have thin leaves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(pine tree, have thin leaves)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(pine tree, have thin leaves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(pine tree, have needle like leaves)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(pine tree, have thin leaves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(pine tree, have needle like leaves)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(pine tree, have thin leaves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(pine tree, have needle like leaves)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(pine tree, have thin leaves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(pine tree, need thin needles)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(pine tree, have thin leaves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(pine tree, have leaves)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(pine tree, have thin leaves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(pine tree, have needle like leaves)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(pine tree, have thin leaves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(pine tree, need thin needles)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(pine tree, have thin leaves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(pine tree, have leaves)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(pine tree, have thin leaves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(pine tree, need thin needles)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(pine tree, have thin leaves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(pine tree, have leaves)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(pine tree, have thin leaves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(pine tree, have leaves)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(pine tree, have thin leaves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(pine tree, need thin needles)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(pine tree, have thin leaves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(pine tree, have thin leaves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(pine tree, have thin leaves)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(pine tree, have thin leaves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(pine tree, have thin leaves)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(pine tree, have thin leaves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(conifer, have leaves)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(pine tree, have thin leaves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(conifer, have needle like leaves)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(pine tree, have thin leaves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(pine, have leaves)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(pine tree, have thin leaves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(conifer, have leaves)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(pine tree, have thin leaves) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(conifer, have needle like leaves)