pine: be good material use

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents wood
Weight: 0.70
, conifer
Weight: 0.67
, species
Weight: 0.66
, deciduous tree
Weight: 0.61
Siblings cedar
Weight: 0.38
, cypress
Weight: 0.38
, birch
Weight: 0.38
, pine tree
Weight: 0.38
, mahogany
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
be good material use 1.00
be good material for building 0.91
be good material for chairs 0.82
is sustainable material 0.82
be such popular material for doors 0.81
is opaque material 0.78
be bad material for bicycle frame 0.78
was very valuable product for inuit 0.78
be used make 0.76
be act good 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(wood, be used make)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(pine, be good material use)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(wood, be bad material for bicycle frame)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(pine, be good material use)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(pine, be good material use)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(wood, be bad material for bicycle frame)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(pine, be good material use)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(wood, be used make)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(pine, be good material use)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(wood, be bad material for bicycle frame)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.16
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(pine, be good material use)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(wood, be used make)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(wood, be used make)
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(pine, be good material use)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(pine, be good material use)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(wood, be bad material for bicycle frame)
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(pine, be good material use)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(pine, be good material use)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(pine, be good material use)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(pine, be good material use)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(pine, be good material use)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(pine, be good material for building)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(pine, be good material use)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(pine, be good material for building)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(pine, be good material use)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(pine, be used make)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(pine, be good material use)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(pine, be used make)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(pine, be good material use)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(pine, be used make)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(pine, be good material use)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(pine, be used make)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(pine, be good material use)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(pine, be good material for building)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(pine, be good material use)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(pine, be good material for building)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(pine, be good material use)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(pine, be good material use)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(pine, be good material use)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(pine, be good material use)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(pine, be good material use)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(pine, be good material use)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(wood, be used make)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(pine, be good material use)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(wood, be bad material for bicycle frame)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(pine, be good material use)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(wood, be used make)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(pine, be good material use)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(wood, be bad material for bicycle frame)