pine: die in forest

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents wood
Weight: 0.70
, conifer
Weight: 0.67
, species
Weight: 0.66
, deciduous tree
Weight: 0.61
Siblings cedar
Weight: 0.38
, cypress
Weight: 0.38
, birch
Weight: 0.38
, pine tree
Weight: 0.38
, mahogany
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
die in kowen forest 1.00
die in forest 1.00
die 0.82
go die 0.79
die in middle 0.78
living in grasslands 0.77
be important to pine trees survivle 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.32
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(conifer, die in middle)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(pine, die in forest)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(conifer, die)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(pine, die in forest)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(conifer, go die)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(pine, die in forest)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(pine, die in forest)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(conifer, go die)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(pine, die in forest)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(conifer, die)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(pine, die in forest)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(conifer, die in middle)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(pine, die in forest)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(conifer, die)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(pine, die in forest)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(conifer, go die)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(pine, die in forest)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(conifer, die in middle)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(pine, die in forest)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(cedar, die)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.26
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(conifer, die in middle)
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(pine, die in forest)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(pine, die in forest)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(conifer, die)
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(pine, die in forest)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(pine, die in forest)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(conifer, go die)
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(pine, die in forest)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(pine, die in forest)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(pine, die in forest)
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(cedar, die)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(cedar, die)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(pine, die in forest)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(pine, die in forest)

Similarity expansion

0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(pine, die in forest)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(pine, be important to pine trees survivle)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(pine, die in forest)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(pine, be important to pine trees survivle)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(pine, die in forest)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(pine, be important to pine trees survivle)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.35
Salient(pine, die in forest)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Salient(pine, be important to pine trees survivle)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Salient(pine, die in forest)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(pine, die in forest)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(pine, die in forest)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(pine, die in forest)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(pine, die in forest)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(pine, die in forest)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(conifer, go die)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(pine, die in forest)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(conifer, die)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(pine, die in forest)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(conifer, die in middle)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(pine, die in forest)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(cedar, die)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(pine, die in forest)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(conifer, go die)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(pine, die in forest)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(conifer, die)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(pine, die in forest)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(conifer, die in middle)