:
from
Related concepts
Related properties
Priors about this statement
Cues
|
Evidence
|
Clauses
Plausibility inference from child typicality
0.26
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(conifer, die)
⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(pine, die in forest)
Plausibility inheritance from parent to child
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(pine, die in forest)
⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(conifer, die)
Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child
0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(pine, die in forest)
⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(conifer, die)
Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(pine, die in forest)
⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(cedar, die)
Remarkability from parent implausibility
Remarkability from sibling implausibility
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(pine, die in forest)
⋁
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(cedar, die)
⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(cedar, die)
Salient implies Plausible
Similarity expansion
Typical and Remarkable implies Salient
Typical implies Plausible
Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child
0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(pine, die in forest)
⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(conifer, die)
Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(pine, die in forest)
⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(cedar, die)
Typicality inheritance from parent to child
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(pine, die in forest)
⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(conifer, die)