pinkie: has quality good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents finger
Weight: 0.42
, scene
Weight: 0.41
, hand
Weight: 0.40
, pony
Weight: 0.40
Siblings thumb
Weight: 0.32
, ring finger
Weight: 0.32
, middle finger
Weight: 0.31
, index finger
Weight: 0.31
, pinky
Weight: 0.30

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality good 1.00
feel good 0.80
has quality questions 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.57
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(pony, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(pinkie, has quality good)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(pony, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(pinkie, has quality good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(pinkie, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(pony, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(pinkie, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(pony, has quality questions)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(pinkie, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(pony, has quality questions)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(pinkie, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(pony, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(pony, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(pinkie, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(pinkie, has quality good)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(pony, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(pinkie, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(pinkie, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(pinkie, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(pinkie, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(pinkie, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(pinkie, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(pinkie, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(pinkie, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(pinkie, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(pinkie, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(pony, has quality good)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(pinkie, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(pony, has quality questions)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(pinkie, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(pony, has quality good)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(pinkie, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(pony, has quality questions)