pipe: be hot

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents device
Weight: 0.63
, wire
Weight: 0.61
, material
Weight: 0.59
, equipment
Weight: 0.58
Siblings pipe bomb
Weight: 0.64
, plastic
Weight: 0.57
, valve
Weight: 0.34
, transformer
Weight: 0.34
, duct tape
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be hot 1.00
melt when it get too hot 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(pipe, be hot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(plastic, melt when it get too hot)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(pipe, be hot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(plastic, melt when it get too hot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(plastic, melt when it get too hot)

Salient implies Plausible

0.14
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(pipe, be hot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(pipe, be hot)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Salient(pipe, be hot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(pipe, be hot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(pipe, be hot)

Typical implies Plausible

0.15
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(pipe, be hot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(pipe, be hot)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(pipe, be hot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(plastic, melt when it get too hot)