piper: have burn

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents man
Weight: 0.60
, member
Weight: 0.49
, thing
Weight: 0.47
, aircraft
Weight: 0.45
Siblings young man
Weight: 0.32
, policeman
Weight: 0.32
, postman
Weight: 0.32
, young woman
Weight: 0.32
, old man
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
have burn 1.00
get burned 0.85

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(piper, have burn)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(piper, have burn)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(piper, have burn)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(piper, get burned)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(piper, have burn)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(piper, get burned)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(piper, have burn)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(piper, get burned)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(piper, have burn)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(piper, get burned)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(piper, have burn)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(piper, have burn)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(piper, have burn)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(piper, have burn)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(piper, have burn)