pistachio: be more expensive than peanuts

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents flavor
Weight: 0.62
, crop
Weight: 0.62
, thing
Weight: 0.56
, fruit
Weight: 0.54
, item
Weight: 0.54
Siblings hazelnut
Weight: 0.36
, pear
Weight: 0.36
, almond
Weight: 0.36
, mango
Weight: 0.35
, pomegranate
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be more expensive than peanuts 1.00
be better than peanuts 0.96
be more expensive than gold 0.81
be more expensive than gold itself 0.79
is nuts expensive 0.78
is expensive 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(thing, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(pistachio, be more expensive than peanuts)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(item, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(pistachio, be more expensive than peanuts)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(pistachio, be more expensive than peanuts)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(item, is expensive)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.16
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(pistachio, be more expensive than peanuts)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(thing, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(pistachio, be more expensive than peanuts)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(item, is expensive)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(pistachio, be more expensive than peanuts)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(thing, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(pistachio, be more expensive than peanuts)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(almond, be better than peanuts)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(pistachio, be more expensive than peanuts)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(hazelnut, is expensive)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(pistachio, be more expensive than peanuts)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(almond, is expensive)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(pistachio, be more expensive than peanuts)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(pomegranate, is expensive)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(thing, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(pistachio, be more expensive than peanuts)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(pistachio, be more expensive than peanuts)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(item, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(pistachio, be more expensive than peanuts)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(pistachio, be more expensive than peanuts)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(pistachio, be more expensive than peanuts)
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(almond, be better than peanuts)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(almond, be better than peanuts)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(pistachio, be more expensive than peanuts)
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(pomegranate, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(pomegranate, is expensive)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(pistachio, be more expensive than peanuts)
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(hazelnut, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(hazelnut, is expensive)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(pistachio, be more expensive than peanuts)
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(almond, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(almond, is expensive)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(pistachio, be more expensive than peanuts)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(pistachio, be more expensive than peanuts)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(pistachio, be more expensive than peanuts)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(pistachio, be more expensive than gold itself)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(pistachio, be more expensive than peanuts)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(pistachio, be more expensive than gold itself)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(pistachio, be more expensive than peanuts)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(pistachio, be more expensive than gold itself)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(pistachio, be more expensive than peanuts)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(pistachio, be better than peanuts)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(pistachio, be more expensive than peanuts)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(pistachio, be better than peanuts)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(pistachio, be more expensive than peanuts)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(pistachio, be more expensive than peanuts)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(pistachio, be more expensive than peanuts)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(pistachio, be more expensive than peanuts)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(pistachio, be more expensive than peanuts)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(pistachio, be more expensive than peanuts)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(item, is expensive)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(pistachio, be more expensive than peanuts)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(thing, is expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(pistachio, be more expensive than peanuts)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(almond, be better than peanuts)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(pistachio, be more expensive than peanuts)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(pomegranate, is expensive)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(pistachio, be more expensive than peanuts)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(hazelnut, is expensive)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(pistachio, be more expensive than peanuts)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(almond, is expensive)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.18
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(pistachio, be more expensive than peanuts)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(item, is expensive)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(pistachio, be more expensive than peanuts)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(thing, is expensive)