pit: be higher tier than pit

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents trap
Weight: 0.61
, excavation
Weight: 0.58
, film
Weight: 0.56
, breed
Weight: 0.55
Siblings short circuit
Weight: 0.31
, dirty dancing
Weight: 0.30
, rear window
Weight: 0.30
, gladiator
Weight: 0.30
, star trek
Weight: 0.29

Related properties

Property Similarity
be higher tier than pit 1.00
be higher tier than normal pit 0.97
be in tier 0.83
be in tier now 0.82
has state tier 0.81
is mid tier 0.80
black pit in japan 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(pit, be higher tier than pit)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(gladiator, be in tier)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(pit, be higher tier than pit)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(gladiator, be in tier now)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(pit, be higher tier than pit)
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(gladiator, be in tier)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(gladiator, be in tier)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(pit, be higher tier than pit)
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(gladiator, be in tier now)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(gladiator, be in tier now)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(pit, be higher tier than pit)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(pit, be higher tier than pit)

Similarity expansion

0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(pit, be higher tier than pit)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(pit, be higher tier than normal pit)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(pit, be higher tier than pit)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(pit, be higher tier than normal pit)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(pit, be higher tier than pit)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(pit, has state tier)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(pit, be higher tier than pit)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(pit, be higher tier than normal pit)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(pit, be higher tier than pit)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(pit, is mid tier)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(pit, be higher tier than pit)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(pit, black pit in japan)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(pit, be higher tier than pit)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(pit, has state tier)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(pit, be higher tier than pit)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(pit, has state tier)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(pit, be higher tier than pit)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(pit, is mid tier)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(pit, be higher tier than pit)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(pit, be higher tier than normal pit)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(pit, be higher tier than pit)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(pit, black pit in japan)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(pit, be higher tier than pit)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(pit, is mid tier)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(pit, be higher tier than pit)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(pit, black pit in japan)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(pit, be higher tier than pit)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(pit, has state tier)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(pit, be higher tier than pit)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(pit, is mid tier)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(pit, be higher tier than pit)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(pit, black pit in japan)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(pit, be higher tier than pit)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(pit, be higher tier than pit)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(pit, be higher tier than pit)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(pit, be higher tier than pit)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(pit, be higher tier than pit)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(pit, be higher tier than pit)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(gladiator, be in tier now)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(pit, be higher tier than pit)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(gladiator, be in tier)