pit: be in game

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents trap
Weight: 0.61
, excavation
Weight: 0.58
, film
Weight: 0.56
, breed
Weight: 0.55
Siblings short circuit
Weight: 0.31
, dirty dancing
Weight: 0.30
, rear window
Weight: 0.30
, gladiator
Weight: 0.30
, star trek
Weight: 0.29

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in game 1.00
is game 0.99
be based on video games 0.80
be in player 0.78
be played 0.78
be played back during shooting 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.35
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(trap, be played) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(pit, be in game)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(pit, be in game) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(trap, be played)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.11
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(pit, be in game) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(trap, be played)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(pit, be in game) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(star trek, be in player)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(trap, be played) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(pit, be in game) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(pit, be in game)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(pit, be in game) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(star trek, be in player) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(star trek, be in player)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(pit, be in game) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(pit, be in game)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(pit, be in game) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(pit, is game)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(pit, be in game) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(pit, is game)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(pit, be in game) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(pit, is game)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(pit, be in game) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(pit, is game)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(pit, be in game) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(pit, be in game) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(pit, be in game)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(pit, be in game) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(pit, be in game)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(pit, be in game) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(trap, be played)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(pit, be in game) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(star trek, be in player)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(pit, be in game) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(trap, be played)