pittsburgh: be better than philadelphia

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents town
Weight: 0.59
, school
Weight: 0.58
, team
Weight: 0.58
, place
Weight: 0.57
Siblings newport
Weight: 0.34
, charleston
Weight: 0.34
, denver
Weight: 0.34
, connecticut
Weight: 0.34
, tennessee
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be better than philadelphia 1.00
be named pittsburgh 0.76
be named after william pitt 0.76
be important to pennsylvania 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(pittsburgh, be better than philadelphia)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(pittsburgh, be better than philadelphia)

Similarity expansion

0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(pittsburgh, be better than philadelphia)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(pittsburgh, be important to pennsylvania)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(pittsburgh, be better than philadelphia)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(pittsburgh, be named after william pitt)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(pittsburgh, be better than philadelphia)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(pittsburgh, be named pittsburgh)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(pittsburgh, be better than philadelphia)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(pittsburgh, be named pittsburgh)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(pittsburgh, be better than philadelphia)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(pittsburgh, be named pittsburgh)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(pittsburgh, be better than philadelphia)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(pittsburgh, be named pittsburgh)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(pittsburgh, be better than philadelphia)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(pittsburgh, be important to pennsylvania)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(pittsburgh, be better than philadelphia)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(pittsburgh, be named after william pitt)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(pittsburgh, be better than philadelphia)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(pittsburgh, be named after william pitt)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(pittsburgh, be better than philadelphia)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(pittsburgh, be important to pennsylvania)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(pittsburgh, be better than philadelphia)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(pittsburgh, be named after william pitt)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(pittsburgh, be better than philadelphia)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(pittsburgh, be important to pennsylvania)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(pittsburgh, be better than philadelphia)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(pittsburgh, be better than philadelphia)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(pittsburgh, be better than philadelphia)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(pittsburgh, be better than philadelphia)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(pittsburgh, be better than philadelphia)