pittsburgh: has color white

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents town
Weight: 0.59
, school
Weight: 0.58
, team
Weight: 0.58
, place
Weight: 0.57
Siblings newport
Weight: 0.34
, charleston
Weight: 0.34
, denver
Weight: 0.34
, connecticut
Weight: 0.34
, tennessee
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
has color white 1.00
has color black 0.97
has color yellow 0.93

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(pittsburgh, has color white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(tennessee, has color yellow)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(pittsburgh, has color white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(tennessee, has color white)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(pittsburgh, has color white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(charleston, has color white)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(pittsburgh, has color white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(tennessee, has color white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(tennessee, has color white)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(pittsburgh, has color white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(charleston, has color white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(charleston, has color white)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(pittsburgh, has color white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(tennessee, has color yellow) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(tennessee, has color yellow)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(pittsburgh, has color white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(pittsburgh, has color white)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(pittsburgh, has color white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(pittsburgh, has color black)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(pittsburgh, has color white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(pittsburgh, has color yellow)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(pittsburgh, has color white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(pittsburgh, has color black)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(pittsburgh, has color white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(pittsburgh, has color black)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(pittsburgh, has color white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(pittsburgh, has color yellow)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(pittsburgh, has color white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(pittsburgh, has color yellow)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(pittsburgh, has color white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(pittsburgh, has color yellow)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(pittsburgh, has color white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(pittsburgh, has color black)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(pittsburgh, has color white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(pittsburgh, has color white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(pittsburgh, has color white)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(pittsburgh, has color white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(pittsburgh, has color white)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(pittsburgh, has color white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(tennessee, has color white)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(pittsburgh, has color white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(tennessee, has color yellow)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(pittsburgh, has color white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(charleston, has color white)