pizzeria: be at populate area

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents italian restaurant
Weight: 0.60
, restaurant
Weight: 0.57
, place
Weight: 0.51
, thing
Weight: 0.49
Siblings deli
Weight: 0.36
, seafood restaurant
Weight: 0.36
, steakhouse
Weight: 0.36
, fast food restaurant
Weight: 0.36
, chinese restaurant
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at populate area 1.00
be at any populate area 0.97
be at area 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(place, be at area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(pizzeria, be at populate area)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(pizzeria, be at populate area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(place, be at area)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(pizzeria, be at populate area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(place, be at area)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(pizzeria, be at populate area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(fast food restaurant, be at any populate area)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(place, be at area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(pizzeria, be at populate area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(pizzeria, be at populate area)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(pizzeria, be at populate area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(fast food restaurant, be at any populate area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(fast food restaurant, be at any populate area)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(pizzeria, be at populate area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(pizzeria, be at populate area)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(pizzeria, be at populate area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(pizzeria, be at populate area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(pizzeria, be at populate area)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(pizzeria, be at populate area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(pizzeria, be at populate area)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(pizzeria, be at populate area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(place, be at area)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(pizzeria, be at populate area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(fast food restaurant, be at any populate area)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.14
Typical(pizzeria, be at populate area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(place, be at area)