place: do second interviews

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents throne
Weight: 0.62
, element
Weight: 0.62
, establishment
Weight: 0.61
Siblings city hall
Weight: 0.68
, spot
Weight: 0.67
, cellar
Weight: 0.67
, west point
Weight: 0.66
, dining table
Weight: 0.66

Related properties

Property Similarity
do second interviews 1.00
do group interviews 0.92
do phone interviews 0.90

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(place, do second interviews) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(place, do second interviews)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(place, do second interviews) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(place, do group interviews)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(place, do second interviews) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(place, do group interviews)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(place, do second interviews) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(place, do phone interviews)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(place, do second interviews) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(place, do phone interviews)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(place, do second interviews) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(place, do group interviews)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(place, do second interviews) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(place, do phone interviews)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(place, do second interviews) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(place, do phone interviews)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(place, do second interviews) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(place, do group interviews)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(place, do second interviews) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(place, do second interviews) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(place, do second interviews)

Typical implies Plausible

0.48
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(place, do second interviews) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(place, do second interviews)