plaintiff: be in cases

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents creditor
Weight: 0.66
, consumer
Weight: 0.61
, third party
Weight: 0.61
, person
Weight: 0.60
, employer
Weight: 0.60
Siblings defendant
Weight: 0.35
, juror
Weight: 0.33
, one person
Weight: 0.33
, other person
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in cases 1.00
be in criminal cases 0.91

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(plaintiff, be in cases) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(plaintiff, be in cases)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(plaintiff, be in cases) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(plaintiff, be in criminal cases)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.00
Typical(plaintiff, be in cases) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(plaintiff, be in criminal cases)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(plaintiff, be in cases) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(plaintiff, be in criminal cases)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(plaintiff, be in cases) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(plaintiff, be in criminal cases)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(plaintiff, be in cases) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(plaintiff, be in cases) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(plaintiff, be in cases)

Typical implies Plausible

0.48
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(plaintiff, be in cases) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(plaintiff, be in cases)