plan: be for cycling

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents proposal
Weight: 0.71
, amendment
Weight: 0.69
, concept
Weight: 0.65
, preparation
Weight: 0.60
Siblings blueprint
Weight: 0.77
, strategy
Weight: 0.65
, road map
Weight: 0.64
, mission
Weight: 0.63
, architect
Weight: 0.63

Related properties

Property Similarity
be for cycling 1.00
be for cycling awful 0.92
be important in sport 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(preparation, be important in sport) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(plan, be for cycling)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(plan, be for cycling) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(preparation, be important in sport)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(plan, be for cycling) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(preparation, be important in sport)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(preparation, be important in sport) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(plan, be for cycling) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(plan, be for cycling)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(plan, be for cycling) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(plan, be for cycling)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(plan, be for cycling) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(plan, be for cycling awful)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(plan, be for cycling) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(plan, be for cycling awful)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(plan, be for cycling) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(plan, be for cycling awful)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(plan, be for cycling) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(plan, be for cycling awful)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(plan, be for cycling) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(plan, be for cycling) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(plan, be for cycling)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(plan, be for cycling) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(plan, be for cycling)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(plan, be for cycling) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(preparation, be important in sport)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.12
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(plan, be for cycling) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(preparation, be important in sport)