plan: be for stadiums

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents proposal
Weight: 0.71
, amendment
Weight: 0.69
, concept
Weight: 0.65
, preparation
Weight: 0.60
Siblings blueprint
Weight: 0.77
, strategy
Weight: 0.65
, road map
Weight: 0.64
, mission
Weight: 0.63
, architect
Weight: 0.63

Related properties

Property Similarity
be for stadiums 1.00
be for new stadiums 0.99

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(plan, be for stadiums) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(plan, be for stadiums)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(plan, be for stadiums) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Plausible(plan, be for new stadiums)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(plan, be for stadiums) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(plan, be for new stadiums)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(plan, be for stadiums) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(plan, be for new stadiums)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(plan, be for stadiums) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(plan, be for new stadiums)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(plan, be for stadiums) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(plan, be for stadiums) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(plan, be for stadiums)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(plan, be for stadiums) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(plan, be for stadiums)