:
from
Related concepts
Related properties
Priors about this statement
Cues
|
Evidence
|
Clauses
Plausibility inference from child typicality
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(amendment, fail)
⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(plan, fails)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(proposal, fail)
⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(plan, fails)
Plausibility inheritance from parent to child
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(plan, fails)
⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(proposal, fail)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(plan, fails)
⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(amendment, fail)
Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child
0.49
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(plan, fails)
⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(proposal, fail)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(plan, fails)
⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(amendment, fail)
Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings
0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(plan, fails)
⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(strategy, fails)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(plan, fails)
⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(strategy, fail rivkin)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(plan, fails)
⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(strategy, fail)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(plan, fails)
⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(strategy, fail hbr)
Remarkability from parent implausibility
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(amendment, fail)
⋁
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(plan, fails)
⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(plan, fails)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(proposal, fail)
⋁
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(plan, fails)
⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(plan, fails)
Remarkability from sibling implausibility
0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(plan, fails)
⋁
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(strategy, fails)
⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(strategy, fails)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(plan, fails)
⋁
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(strategy, fail)
⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(strategy, fail)
Salient implies Plausible
0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(plan, fails)
⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(plan, fails)
Similarity expansion
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(plan, fails)
⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Salient(plan, fail)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(plan, fails)
⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(plan, fail)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(plan, fails)
⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(plan, fail)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(plan, fails)
⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(plan, fail)
Typical and Remarkable implies Salient
0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(plan, fails)
⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(plan, fails)
⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(plan, fails)
Typical implies Plausible
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(plan, fails)
⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(plan, fails)
Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child
0.43
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(plan, fails)
⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(proposal, fail)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(plan, fails)
⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(amendment, fail)
Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings
0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(plan, fails)
⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(strategy, fails)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(plan, fails)
⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(strategy, fail rivkin)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(plan, fails)
⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(strategy, fail)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(plan, fails)
⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(strategy, fail hbr)
Typicality inheritance from parent to child
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(plan, fails)
⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(proposal, fail)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(plan, fails)
⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(amendment, fail)