plant: be at surface of earth

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents power plant
Weight: 0.83
, subject
Weight: 0.59
, industry
Weight: 0.58
, operation
Weight: 0.57
Siblings nuclear power plant
Weight: 0.85
, vegetable garden
Weight: 0.69
, apple tree
Weight: 0.67
, aloe vera
Weight: 0.67
, poison ivy
Weight: 0.66

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at surface of earth 1.00
be at earth 0.92
be important on earth 0.83
be at soil 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(plant, be at surface of earth)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(apple tree, be at earth)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(plant, be at surface of earth)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(vegetable garden, be at soil)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(plant, be at surface of earth)
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(apple tree, be at earth)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(apple tree, be at earth)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(plant, be at surface of earth)
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(vegetable garden, be at soil)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(vegetable garden, be at soil)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(plant, be at surface of earth)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(plant, be at surface of earth)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(plant, be at surface of earth)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(plant, be important on earth)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(plant, be at surface of earth)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(plant, be important on earth)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(plant, be at surface of earth)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(plant, be important on earth)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(plant, be at surface of earth)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(plant, be important on earth)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(plant, be at surface of earth)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(plant, be at surface of earth)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(plant, be at surface of earth)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(plant, be at surface of earth)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(plant, be at surface of earth)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(plant, be at surface of earth)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(apple tree, be at earth)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(plant, be at surface of earth)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(vegetable garden, be at soil)