plantation: be a part of florida

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents land
Weight: 0.60
, development
Weight: 0.57
, real estate
Weight: 0.56
, thing
Weight: 0.52
Siblings real estate agent
Weight: 0.32
, farm
Weight: 0.32
, cyprus
Weight: 0.31
, cottage
Weight: 0.31
, property
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be a part of florida 1.00
be at texas 0.82
be at georgia 0.81
be at oklahoma 0.79
be at nebraska 0.78
be expensive in boston 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(real estate, be expensive in boston)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(plantation, be a part of florida)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(land, be at oklahoma)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(plantation, be a part of florida)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(land, be at texas)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(plantation, be a part of florida)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(plantation, be a part of florida)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(land, be at texas)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(plantation, be a part of florida)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(land, be at oklahoma)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(plantation, be a part of florida)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(real estate, be expensive in boston)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(plantation, be a part of florida)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(land, be at oklahoma)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(plantation, be a part of florida)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(land, be at texas)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(plantation, be a part of florida)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(real estate, be expensive in boston)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(plantation, be a part of florida)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(farm, be at nebraska)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(land, be at texas)
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(plantation, be a part of florida)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(plantation, be a part of florida)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(land, be at oklahoma)
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(plantation, be a part of florida)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(plantation, be a part of florida)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(real estate, be expensive in boston)
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(plantation, be a part of florida)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(plantation, be a part of florida)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(plantation, be a part of florida)
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(farm, be at nebraska)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(farm, be at nebraska)

Salient implies Plausible

0.08
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(plantation, be a part of florida)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(plantation, be a part of florida)

Similarity expansion

0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(plantation, be a part of florida)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(plantation, be at georgia)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(plantation, be a part of florida)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(plantation, be at georgia)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(plantation, be a part of florida)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(plantation, be at georgia)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(plantation, be a part of florida)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(plantation, be at georgia)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(plantation, be a part of florida)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(plantation, be a part of florida)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(plantation, be a part of florida)

Typical implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(plantation, be a part of florida)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(plantation, be a part of florida)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(plantation, be a part of florida)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(real estate, be expensive in boston)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(plantation, be a part of florida)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(land, be at texas)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(plantation, be a part of florida)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(land, be at oklahoma)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(plantation, be a part of florida)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(farm, be at nebraska)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(plantation, be a part of florida)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(real estate, be expensive in boston)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(plantation, be a part of florida)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(land, be at texas)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(plantation, be a part of florida)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(land, be at oklahoma)