plastic: is insulators

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents polymer
Weight: 0.72
, type
Weight: 0.63
, material
Weight: 0.58
, item
Weight: 0.58
, electronic device
Weight: 0.57
Siblings plastic wrap
Weight: 0.76
, aluminum foil
Weight: 0.72
, acrylic
Weight: 0.66
, silicone
Weight: 0.66
, trash bag
Weight: 0.66

Related properties

Property Similarity
is insulators 1.00
is is insulators 1.00
make insulators 0.98
is good insulators 0.98
is is good insulators 0.98
is used as insulators 0.97
be used as insulators 0.97
make good insulators 0.96
is electrical insulators 0.96
is good electrical insulators 0.95

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(polymer, is good insulators)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(plastic, is insulators)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(polymer, is insulators)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(plastic, is insulators)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(plastic, is insulators)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(polymer, is insulators)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(plastic, is insulators)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(polymer, is good insulators)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(plastic, is insulators)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(polymer, is good insulators)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(plastic, is insulators)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(polymer, is insulators)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(polymer, is good insulators)
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(plastic, is insulators)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(plastic, is insulators)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(polymer, is insulators)
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(plastic, is insulators)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(plastic, is insulators)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(plastic, is insulators)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(plastic, is insulators)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(plastic, is insulators)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(plastic, is good insulators)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(plastic, is insulators)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(plastic, is good insulators)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(plastic, is insulators)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(plastic, is good insulators)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(plastic, is insulators)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(plastic, is good electrical insulators)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(plastic, is insulators)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(plastic, is good insulators)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(plastic, is insulators)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(plastic, is good electrical insulators)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(plastic, is insulators)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(plastic, is good electrical insulators)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(plastic, is insulators)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(plastic, is good electrical insulators)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(plastic, is insulators)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(plastic, is insulators)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(plastic, is insulators)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(plastic, is insulators)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(plastic, is insulators)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(plastic, is insulators)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(polymer, is insulators)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(plastic, is insulators)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(polymer, is good insulators)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(plastic, is insulators)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(polymer, is insulators)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(plastic, is insulators)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(polymer, is good insulators)