platinum: be cheap compared to gold

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents metal
Weight: 0.65
, commodity
Weight: 0.62
, catalyst
Weight: 0.62
, material
Weight: 0.62
, heavy metal
Weight: 0.61
Siblings osmium
Weight: 0.41
, gold
Weight: 0.36
, copper
Weight: 0.35
, iron oxide
Weight: 0.34
, cobalt
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be cheap compared to gold 1.00
be cheaper than gold 0.88
be expensive than gold 0.87
be cheaper right than gold 0.87
be less expensive than gold 0.85
be more expensive than gold 0.85
be higher than gold 0.84
be less than gold 0.84
be lower than gold 0.84
be better than gold 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(platinum, be cheap compared to gold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(copper, be better than gold)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(platinum, be cheap compared to gold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(copper, be better than gold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(copper, be better than gold)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(platinum, be cheap compared to gold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(platinum, be cheap compared to gold)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(platinum, be cheap compared to gold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(platinum, be cheaper than gold)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(platinum, be cheap compared to gold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(platinum, be expensive than gold)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(platinum, be cheap compared to gold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(platinum, be cheaper than gold)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(platinum, be cheap compared to gold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(platinum, be expensive than gold)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(platinum, be cheap compared to gold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(platinum, be less expensive than gold)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(platinum, be cheap compared to gold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(platinum, be cheap compared to gold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(platinum, be cheap compared to gold)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(platinum, be cheap compared to gold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(platinum, be cheap compared to gold)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(platinum, be cheap compared to gold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(copper, be better than gold)