play hockey: be used to win

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents sport
Weight: 0.62
Siblings hockey game
Weight: 0.39
, hockey player
Weight: 0.38
, ice hockey
Weight: 0.38
, hockey stick
Weight: 0.38
, hockey
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
be used to win 1.00
causes win 0.95
be motivated by win 0.94
causes win game 0.91
has lot of award to be win 0.82
has winner 0.76
causes be winner 0.75
be used to play 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(sport, has winner) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(play hockey, be used to win)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(sport, be used to play) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(play hockey, be used to win)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(sport, has lot of award to be win) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(play hockey, be used to win)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(play hockey, be used to win) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(sport, has lot of award to be win)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(play hockey, be used to win) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(sport, be used to play)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(play hockey, be used to win) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(sport, has winner)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(play hockey, be used to win) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(sport, has winner)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(play hockey, be used to win) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(sport, has lot of award to be win)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(play hockey, be used to win) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(sport, be used to play)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(sport, has lot of award to be win) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(play hockey, be used to win) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(play hockey, be used to win)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(sport, has winner) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(play hockey, be used to win) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(play hockey, be used to win)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(sport, be used to play) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(play hockey, be used to win) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(play hockey, be used to win)

Salient implies Plausible

0.12
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(play hockey, be used to win) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(play hockey, be used to win)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(play hockey, be used to win) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(play hockey, causes win)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(play hockey, be used to win) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(play hockey, be motivated by win)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(play hockey, be used to win) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(play hockey, causes win game)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(play hockey, be used to win) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(play hockey, be motivated by win)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(play hockey, be used to win) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(play hockey, causes win game)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(play hockey, be used to win) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(play hockey, causes win)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(play hockey, be used to win) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(play hockey, causes win)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(play hockey, be used to win) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(play hockey, be motivated by win)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(play hockey, be used to win) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(play hockey, causes be winner)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(play hockey, be used to win) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(play hockey, causes win)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(play hockey, be used to win) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(play hockey, causes win game)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(play hockey, be used to win) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(play hockey, be motivated by win)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(play hockey, be used to win) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(play hockey, causes win game)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(play hockey, be used to win) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(play hockey, causes be winner)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(play hockey, be used to win) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(play hockey, causes be winner)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(play hockey, be used to win) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(play hockey, causes be winner)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(play hockey, be used to win) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(play hockey, be used to win) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(play hockey, be used to win)

Typical implies Plausible

0.15
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(play hockey, be used to win) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(play hockey, be used to win)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(play hockey, be used to win) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(sport, be used to play)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(play hockey, be used to win) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(sport, has winner)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(play hockey, be used to win) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(sport, has lot of award to be win)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(play hockey, be used to win) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(sport, be used to play)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(play hockey, be used to win) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(sport, has winner)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(play hockey, be used to win) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(sport, has lot of award to be win)