play poker: causes competition

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents -
Siblings -

Related properties

Property Similarity
causes competition 1.00
be used to competition 0.96
causes player compete 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(play poker, causes competition) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(play poker, causes competition)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(play poker, causes competition) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(play poker, be used to competition)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(play poker, causes competition) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(play poker, be used to competition)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(play poker, causes competition) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(play poker, be used to competition)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(play poker, causes competition) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(play poker, be used to competition)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(play poker, causes competition) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(play poker, causes competition) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(play poker, causes competition)

Typical implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(play poker, causes competition) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(play poker, causes competition)