play: be allowed in hockey

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents action
Weight: 0.64
, project
Weight: 0.58
, series
Weight: 0.58
, song
Weight: 0.57
Siblings punt
Weight: 0.66
, field goal
Weight: 0.65
, dream
Weight: 0.62
, interception
Weight: 0.59
, out
Weight: 0.59

Related properties

Property Similarity
be allowed in hockey 1.00
is lacrosse 0.78
lacrosse 0.78
be in football 0.76
basketball 0.76
baseball 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(play, be allowed in hockey) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(field goal, be in football)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(play, be allowed in hockey) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(field goal, be in football) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(field goal, be in football)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(play, be allowed in hockey) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(play, be allowed in hockey)

Similarity expansion

0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(play, be allowed in hockey) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(play, lacrosse)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(play, be allowed in hockey) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(play, be in football)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(play, be allowed in hockey) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(play, lacrosse)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(play, be allowed in hockey) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(play, be in football)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(play, be allowed in hockey) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(play, baseball)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(play, be allowed in hockey) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(play, be in football)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(play, be allowed in hockey) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(play, lacrosse)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(play, be allowed in hockey) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(play, lacrosse)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(play, be allowed in hockey) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(play, baseball)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(play, be allowed in hockey) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(play, be in football)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(play, be allowed in hockey) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(play, baseball)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(play, be allowed in hockey) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(play, baseball)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(play, be allowed in hockey) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(play, basketball)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(play, be allowed in hockey) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(play, is lacrosse)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(play, be allowed in hockey) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(play, basketball)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(play, be allowed in hockey) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(play, is lacrosse)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(play, be allowed in hockey) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(play, basketball)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(play, be allowed in hockey) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(play, basketball)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(play, be allowed in hockey) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(play, is lacrosse)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(play, be allowed in hockey) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(play, is lacrosse)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(play, be allowed in hockey) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(play, be allowed in hockey) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(play, be allowed in hockey)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(play, be allowed in hockey) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(play, be allowed in hockey)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(play, be allowed in hockey) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(field goal, be in football)