player: field ball

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents basketball player
Weight: 0.69
, person
Weight: 0.65
Siblings dvd player
Weight: 0.82
, baseball player
Weight: 0.73

Related properties

Property Similarity
field ball 1.00
head ball 0.89
ball hogger 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(player, field ball)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(baseball player, field ball)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(player, field ball)
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(baseball player, field ball)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(baseball player, field ball)

Salient implies Plausible

0.15
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(player, field ball)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(player, field ball)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(player, field ball)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(player, ball hogger)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(player, field ball)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(player, ball hogger)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(player, field ball)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(player, head ball)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(player, field ball)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(player, ball hogger)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(player, field ball)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(player, head ball)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(player, field ball)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(player, head ball)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(player, field ball)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(player, head ball)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(player, field ball)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(player, ball hogger)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(player, field ball)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(player, field ball)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(player, field ball)

Typical implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(player, field ball)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(player, field ball)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(player, field ball)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(baseball player, field ball)