plies: be in jail

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents rapper
Weight: 0.31
Siblings wale
Weight: 0.24
, ice cube
Weight: 0.24
, nas
Weight: 0.24
, nelly
Weight: 0.23
, drake
Weight: 0.23

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in jail 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(plies, be in jail) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(nelly, be in jail)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(plies, be in jail) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(nelly, be in jail) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(nelly, be in jail)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(plies, be in jail) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(plies, be in jail)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(plies, be in jail) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(plies, be in jail) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(plies, be in jail)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(plies, be in jail) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(plies, be in jail)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(plies, be in jail) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(nelly, be in jail)