plum: be vs red plums

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fruit
Weight: 0.62
, color
Weight: 0.58
, purple
Weight: 0.58
, plastic
Weight: 0.56
, crop
Weight: 0.53
Siblings persimmon
Weight: 0.34
, mango
Weight: 0.34
, peach
Weight: 0.34
, raspberry
Weight: 0.33
, apricot
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be vs red plums 1.00
be vs plums 0.98
is vs prunes 0.84
be vs prunes for constipation 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(plum, be vs red plums)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(plum, be vs red plums)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(plum, be vs red plums)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(plum, be vs plums)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(plum, be vs red plums)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(plum, be vs plums)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(plum, be vs red plums)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(plum, be vs plums)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(plum, be vs red plums)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(plum, be vs plums)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(plum, be vs red plums)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(plum, is vs prunes)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(plum, be vs red plums)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(plum, is vs prunes)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(plum, be vs red plums)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(plum, is vs prunes)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(plum, be vs red plums)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(plum, be vs prunes for constipation)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(plum, be vs red plums)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(plum, be vs prunes for constipation)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(plum, be vs red plums)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(plum, be vs prunes for constipation)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(plum, be vs red plums)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(plum, is vs prunes)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(plum, be vs red plums)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(plum, be vs prunes for constipation)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(plum, be vs red plums)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(plum, be vs red plums)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(plum, be vs red plums)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(plum, be vs red plums)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(plum, be vs red plums)