plymouth: be more famous than jamestown

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents town
Weight: 0.57
, place
Weight: 0.57
, brand
Weight: 0.55
, city
Weight: 0.53
Siblings lancaster
Weight: 0.34
, connecticut
Weight: 0.34
, dover
Weight: 0.34
, norfolk
Weight: 0.34
, venice
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be more famous than jamestown 1.00
be more important than jamestown 0.88
is famous 0.85
be better than jamestown 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(plymouth, be more famous than jamestown)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(dover, is famous)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(plymouth, be more famous than jamestown)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(venice, is famous)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(plymouth, be more famous than jamestown)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(connecticut, is famous)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(plymouth, be more famous than jamestown)
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(connecticut, is famous)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(connecticut, is famous)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(plymouth, be more famous than jamestown)
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(venice, is famous)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(venice, is famous)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(plymouth, be more famous than jamestown)
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(dover, is famous)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(dover, is famous)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(plymouth, be more famous than jamestown)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(plymouth, be more famous than jamestown)

Similarity expansion

0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(plymouth, be more famous than jamestown)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(plymouth, be better than jamestown)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(plymouth, be more famous than jamestown)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(plymouth, be more important than jamestown)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(plymouth, be more famous than jamestown)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(plymouth, be better than jamestown)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(plymouth, be more famous than jamestown)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(plymouth, be more important than jamestown)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(plymouth, be more famous than jamestown)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(plymouth, be better than jamestown)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(plymouth, be more famous than jamestown)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(plymouth, be more important than jamestown)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(plymouth, be more famous than jamestown)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(plymouth, is famous)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(plymouth, be more famous than jamestown)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(plymouth, be more important than jamestown)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(plymouth, be more famous than jamestown)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(plymouth, be better than jamestown)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(plymouth, be more famous than jamestown)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(plymouth, is famous)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(plymouth, be more famous than jamestown)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(plymouth, is famous)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(plymouth, be more famous than jamestown)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(plymouth, is famous)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(plymouth, be more famous than jamestown)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(plymouth, be more famous than jamestown)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(plymouth, be more famous than jamestown)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(plymouth, be more famous than jamestown)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(plymouth, be more famous than jamestown)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(plymouth, be more famous than jamestown)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(connecticut, is famous)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(plymouth, be more famous than jamestown)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(dover, is famous)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(plymouth, be more famous than jamestown)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(venice, is famous)