pocket watch: have chains

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents pocket
Weight: 0.78
, item
Weight: 0.63
, watch
Weight: 0.62
, antique
Weight: 0.59
Siblings pocket knife
Weight: 0.40
, wrist watch
Weight: 0.38
, shopping bag
Weight: 0.34
, wallet
Weight: 0.33
, trash bag
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
have chains 1.00
be in stores 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.10
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(pocket watch, have chains) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(wallet, have chains)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(pocket watch, have chains) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(wallet, have chains) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(wallet, have chains)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(pocket watch, have chains) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(pocket watch, have chains)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(pocket watch, have chains) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(pocket watch, have chains) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(pocket watch, have chains)

Typical implies Plausible

0.48
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(pocket watch, have chains) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(pocket watch, have chains)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(pocket watch, have chains) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(wallet, have chains)