pocket: be in men 's underwear

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents knife
Weight: 0.59
, thing
Weight: 0.58
, purse
Weight: 0.57
, size
Weight: 0.57
, firearm
Weight: 0.57
Siblings pocket knife
Weight: 0.79
, swiss army knife
Weight: 0.55
, briefcase
Weight: 0.33
, pant
Weight: 0.33
, backpack
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in men 's underwear 1.00
be in women 's underwear 0.98
be in underwear 0.96
be in ladies underwear 0.93
be in crotch of womens underwear 0.89
be in crotch of womens panties 0.85
be in panties 0.85
be on clothes 0.82
be in thongs 0.81
be in thong 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(pocket, be in men 's underwear) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(pocket, be in men 's underwear)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(pocket, be in men 's underwear) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(pocket, be in underwear)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(pocket, be in men 's underwear) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(pocket, be in underwear)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(pocket, be in men 's underwear) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(pocket, be in underwear)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(pocket, be in men 's underwear) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(pocket, be in ladies underwear)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(pocket, be in men 's underwear) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(pocket, be in ladies underwear)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(pocket, be in men 's underwear) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(pocket, be in women 's underwear)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(pocket, be in men 's underwear) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(pocket, be in ladies underwear)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(pocket, be in men 's underwear) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(pocket, be in underwear)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(pocket, be in men 's underwear) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(pocket, be in ladies underwear)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(pocket, be in men 's underwear) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(pocket, be on clothes)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(pocket, be in men 's underwear) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(pocket, be in thong)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(pocket, be in men 's underwear) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(pocket, be in women 's underwear)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(pocket, be in men 's underwear) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(pocket, be in women 's underwear)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(pocket, be in men 's underwear) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(pocket, be in crotch of womens underwear)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(pocket, be in men 's underwear) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(pocket, be in panties)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(pocket, be in men 's underwear) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(pocket, be in thong)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(pocket, be in men 's underwear) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(pocket, be in crotch of womens underwear)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(pocket, be in men 's underwear) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(pocket, be in women 's underwear)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(pocket, be in men 's underwear) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(pocket, be in thong)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(pocket, be in men 's underwear) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(pocket, be on clothes)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(pocket, be in men 's underwear) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(pocket, be in thongs)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(pocket, be in men 's underwear) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(pocket, be in panties)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(pocket, be in men 's underwear) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(pocket, be in panties)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(pocket, be in men 's underwear) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(pocket, be in crotch of womens underwear)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(pocket, be in men 's underwear) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(pocket, be in crotch of womens panties)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(pocket, be in men 's underwear) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(pocket, be in crotch of womens panties)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(pocket, be in men 's underwear) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(pocket, be in thongs)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(pocket, be in men 's underwear) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(pocket, be in crotch of womens underwear)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(pocket, be in men 's underwear) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(pocket, be in thong)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(pocket, be in men 's underwear) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(pocket, be on clothes)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(pocket, be in men 's underwear) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(pocket, be in thongs)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(pocket, be in men 's underwear) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(pocket, be in crotch of womens panties)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(pocket, be in men 's underwear) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(pocket, be in crotch of womens panties)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(pocket, be in men 's underwear) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(pocket, be in panties)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(pocket, be in men 's underwear) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(pocket, be in thongs)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(pocket, be in men 's underwear) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(pocket, be on clothes)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(pocket, be in men 's underwear) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(pocket, be in men 's underwear) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(pocket, be in men 's underwear)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(pocket, be in men 's underwear) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(pocket, be in men 's underwear)