poetry: reflect love of natural beauty

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents journal
Weight: 0.67
, art
Weight: 0.64
, expression
Weight: 0.63
, medium
Weight: 0.62
, composition
Weight: 0.62
Siblings verse
Weight: 0.63
, poem
Weight: 0.37
, literature
Weight: 0.36
, calligraphy
Weight: 0.36
, fiction
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
reflect love of natural beauty 1.00
reflect love 0.87
is beautiful 0.79
reflect light of common folk 0.77
reflect light of folk 0.77
reflect line of common folk 0.76
be rich in spirituality 0.76
reflect line of folk 0.76
reflects on life reality 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(art, reflect line of common folk)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(poetry, reflect love of natural beauty)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(poetry, reflect love of natural beauty)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(art, reflect line of common folk)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(poetry, reflect love of natural beauty)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(art, reflect line of common folk)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(poetry, reflect love of natural beauty)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(literature, reflects on life reality)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(poetry, reflect love of natural beauty)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(literature, be rich in spirituality)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(art, reflect line of common folk)
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(poetry, reflect love of natural beauty)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(poetry, reflect love of natural beauty)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(poetry, reflect love of natural beauty)
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(literature, be rich in spirituality)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(literature, be rich in spirituality)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(poetry, reflect love of natural beauty)
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(literature, reflects on life reality)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(literature, reflects on life reality)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(poetry, reflect love of natural beauty)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(poetry, reflect love of natural beauty)

Similarity expansion

0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(poetry, reflect love of natural beauty)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(poetry, reflect love)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(poetry, reflect love of natural beauty)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(poetry, reflect love)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(poetry, reflect love of natural beauty)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(poetry, reflect love)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(poetry, reflect love of natural beauty)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(poetry, reflect love)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(poetry, reflect love of natural beauty)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(poetry, is beautiful)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(poetry, reflect love of natural beauty)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(poetry, is beautiful)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(poetry, reflect love of natural beauty)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(poetry, is beautiful)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(poetry, reflect love of natural beauty)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(poetry, is beautiful)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(poetry, reflect love of natural beauty)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(poetry, reflect love of natural beauty)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(poetry, reflect love of natural beauty)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(poetry, reflect love of natural beauty)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(poetry, reflect love of natural beauty)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(poetry, reflect love of natural beauty)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(art, reflect line of common folk)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(poetry, reflect love of natural beauty)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(literature, be rich in spirituality)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(poetry, reflect love of natural beauty)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(literature, reflects on life reality)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(poetry, reflect love of natural beauty)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(art, reflect line of common folk)