poetry: was invented

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents journal
Weight: 0.67
, art
Weight: 0.64
, expression
Weight: 0.63
, medium
Weight: 0.62
, composition
Weight: 0.62
Siblings verse
Weight: 0.63
, poem
Weight: 0.37
, literature
Weight: 0.36
, calligraphy
Weight: 0.36
, fiction
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
was invented 1.00
was used before invention of camera 0.79
was created 0.79
be developed 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(art, was invented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(poetry, was invented)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(art, was created) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(poetry, was invented)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(poetry, was invented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(art, was invented)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(poetry, was invented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(art, was created)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(poetry, was invented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(art, was invented)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(poetry, was invented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(art, was created)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(poetry, was invented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(calligraphy, was invented)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(poetry, was invented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(literature, was invented)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(art, was invented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(poetry, was invented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(poetry, was invented)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(art, was created) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(poetry, was invented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(poetry, was invented)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(poetry, was invented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(literature, was invented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(literature, was invented)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(poetry, was invented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(calligraphy, was invented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(calligraphy, was invented)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(poetry, was invented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(poetry, was invented)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(poetry, was invented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(poetry, was created)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(poetry, was invented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(poetry, was created)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(poetry, was invented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(poetry, was created)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(poetry, was invented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(poetry, was created)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(poetry, was invented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(poetry, was invented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(poetry, was invented)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(poetry, was invented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(poetry, was invented)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(poetry, was invented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(art, was created)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(poetry, was invented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(art, was invented)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(poetry, was invented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(literature, was invented)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(poetry, was invented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(calligraphy, was invented)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(poetry, was invented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(art, was invented)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(poetry, was invented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(art, was created)