point: be determined in story

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents factor
Weight: 0.64
, lead
Weight: 0.64
, logic
Weight: 0.63
Siblings pressure point
Weight: 0.67
, boiling point
Weight: 0.61
, field goal
Weight: 0.61
, moment
Weight: 0.61
, end
Weight: 0.61

Related properties

Property Similarity
be determined in story 1.00
be determined 0.83
be important in narrative 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(point, be determined in story)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(end, be determined)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(point, be determined in story)
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(end, be determined)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(end, be determined)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(point, be determined in story)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(point, be determined in story)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(point, be determined in story)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(point, be determined)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(point, be determined in story)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(point, be important in narrative)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(point, be determined in story)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(point, be determined)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(point, be determined in story)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(point, be determined)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(point, be determined in story)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(point, be determined)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(point, be determined in story)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(point, be important in narrative)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(point, be determined in story)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(point, be important in narrative)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(point, be determined in story)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(point, be important in narrative)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(point, be determined in story)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(point, be determined in story)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(point, be determined in story)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(point, be determined in story)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(point, be determined in story)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(point, be determined in story)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(end, be determined)