point: is intensive property

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents factor
Weight: 0.64
, lead
Weight: 0.64
, logic
Weight: 0.63
Siblings pressure point
Weight: 0.67
, boiling point
Weight: 0.61
, field goal
Weight: 0.61
, moment
Weight: 0.61
, end
Weight: 0.61

Related properties

Property Similarity
is intensive property 1.00
is intensive 0.91
is property 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(point, is intensive property) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(boiling point, is intensive property)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(point, is intensive property) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(boiling point, is property)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(point, is intensive property) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(boiling point, is intensive property) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(boiling point, is intensive property)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(point, is intensive property) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(boiling point, is property) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(boiling point, is property)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(point, is intensive property) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(point, is intensive property)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(point, is intensive property) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(point, is property)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(point, is intensive property) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(point, is property)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(point, is intensive property) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(point, is property)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(point, is intensive property) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(point, is property)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(point, is intensive property) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(point, is intensive property) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(point, is intensive property)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(point, is intensive property) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(point, is intensive property)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(point, is intensive property) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(boiling point, is intensive property)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(point, is intensive property) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(boiling point, is property)