pointer: has quality better

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents index
Weight: 0.58
, address
Weight: 0.57
, thing
Weight: 0.56
, item
Weight: 0.56
Siblings arrow
Weight: 0.60
, cursor
Weight: 0.57
, jumper cable
Weight: 0.34
, jumper
Weight: 0.34
, basket
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality better 1.00
has quality plus 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(pointer, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(jumper cable, has quality better)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(pointer, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(cursor, has quality plus)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(pointer, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(jumper cable, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(jumper cable, has quality better)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(pointer, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(cursor, has quality plus)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(cursor, has quality plus)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(pointer, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(pointer, has quality better)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(pointer, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(pointer, has quality plus)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(pointer, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(pointer, has quality plus)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(pointer, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(pointer, has quality plus)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(pointer, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(pointer, has quality plus)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(pointer, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(pointer, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(pointer, has quality better)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(pointer, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(pointer, has quality better)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(pointer, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(cursor, has quality plus)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(pointer, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(jumper cable, has quality better)