polar bear: be white

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents bear
Weight: 0.79
, brown bear
Weight: 0.75
, mammal
Weight: 0.75
, wild animal
Weight: 0.72
, predator
Weight: 0.70
Siblings arctic fox
Weight: 0.74
, black bear
Weight: 0.41
, grizzly bear
Weight: 0.39
, panda bear
Weight: 0.38
, moose
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
be white 1.00
be black and white 0.97

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(polar bear, be white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(panda bear, be black and white)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(polar bear, be white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(panda bear, be black and white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(panda bear, be black and white)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(polar bear, be white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(polar bear, be white)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Salient(polar bear, be white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(polar bear, be white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(polar bear, be white)

Typical implies Plausible

0.09
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(polar bear, be white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(polar bear, be white)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(polar bear, be white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(panda bear, be black and white)