polar bear: have large feet

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents bear
Weight: 0.79
, brown bear
Weight: 0.75
, mammal
Weight: 0.75
, arctic
Weight: 0.72
Siblings arctic fox
Weight: 0.74
, black bear
Weight: 0.41
, grizzly bear
Weight: 0.39
, panda bear
Weight: 0.38
, moose
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
have large feet 1.00
have big feet 0.94
have wide feet 0.89
has size large 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(polar bear, have large feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, have big feet)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(polar bear, have large feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(arctic fox, have big feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(arctic fox, have big feet)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(polar bear, have large feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(polar bear, have large feet)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(polar bear, have large feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(polar bear, have big feet)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(polar bear, have large feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(polar bear, have big feet)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(polar bear, have large feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(polar bear, have big feet)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(polar bear, have large feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(polar bear, have big feet)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(polar bear, have large feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(polar bear, has size large)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(polar bear, have large feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(polar bear, has size large)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(polar bear, have large feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(polar bear, has size large)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(polar bear, have large feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(polar bear, has size large)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(polar bear, have large feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(polar bear, have large feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(polar bear, have large feet)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(polar bear, have large feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(polar bear, have large feet)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(polar bear, have large feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(arctic fox, have big feet)