pole: be considered deserts

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents place
Weight: 0.58
, material
Weight: 0.57
, car
Weight: 0.57
Siblings north pole
Weight: 0.63
, lap
Weight: 0.32
, police car
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be considered deserts 1.00
is desert 0.85

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(pole, be considered deserts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(north pole, is desert)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(pole, be considered deserts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(north pole, is desert) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(north pole, is desert)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(pole, be considered deserts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(pole, be considered deserts)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(pole, be considered deserts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(pole, is desert)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(pole, be considered deserts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(pole, is desert)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(pole, be considered deserts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(pole, is desert)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(pole, be considered deserts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(pole, is desert)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(pole, be considered deserts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(pole, be considered deserts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(pole, be considered deserts)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(pole, be considered deserts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(pole, be considered deserts)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(pole, be considered deserts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(north pole, is desert)