pole: be in fair territory

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents place
Weight: 0.58
, material
Weight: 0.57
, car
Weight: 0.57
Siblings north pole
Weight: 0.63
, lap
Weight: 0.32
, police car
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in fair territory 1.00
be in territory 0.90
has state fair 0.84

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(pole, be in fair territory) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(pole, be in fair territory)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(pole, be in fair territory) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(pole, has state fair)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(pole, be in fair territory) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(pole, has state fair)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(pole, be in fair territory) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(pole, has state fair)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(pole, be in fair territory) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(pole, has state fair)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(pole, be in fair territory) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(pole, be in fair territory) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(pole, be in fair territory)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(pole, be in fair territory) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(pole, be in fair territory)