pole: be in summer

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents place
Weight: 0.58
, material
Weight: 0.57
, car
Weight: 0.57
Siblings north pole
Weight: 0.63
, lap
Weight: 0.32
, police car
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in summer 1.00
have during summer 0.95
south have winter in june 0.78
has six months night 0.77
have six months night 0.77
has six months day 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(pole, be in summer)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(north pole, have during summer)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(pole, be in summer)
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(north pole, have during summer)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(north pole, have during summer)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(pole, be in summer)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(pole, be in summer)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(pole, be in summer)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(pole, have during summer)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(pole, be in summer)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(pole, have during summer)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(pole, be in summer)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(pole, have during summer)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(pole, be in summer)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(pole, have during summer)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(pole, be in summer)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(pole, south have winter in june)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(pole, be in summer)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(pole, has six months night)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(pole, be in summer)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(pole, have six months night)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(pole, be in summer)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(pole, has six months day)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(pole, be in summer)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(pole, south have winter in june)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(pole, be in summer)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(pole, south have winter in june)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(pole, be in summer)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(pole, has six months night)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(pole, be in summer)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(pole, have six months night)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(pole, be in summer)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(pole, have six months night)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(pole, be in summer)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(pole, has six months night)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(pole, be in summer)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Salient(pole, has six months day)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(pole, be in summer)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(pole, has six months day)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(pole, be in summer)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(pole, have six months night)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(pole, be in summer)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(pole, south have winter in june)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(pole, be in summer)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(pole, has six months night)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(pole, be in summer)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(pole, has six months day)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(pole, be in summer)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(pole, be in summer)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(pole, be in summer)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(pole, be in summer)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(pole, be in summer)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(pole, be in summer)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(north pole, have during summer)